I've added Polar as secondary label, as that's the European element of this issue... the addition of the obi (without Polar), is what makes it Taiwanese.
>Oh, wait, I see...Both images here are the back of the extended obi, not the obi and the actual back cover! - Still, odd that the Obi, containing a European Polar release only, would omit the issuing label of the CD inside <
Would still like an actual back cover image from original entry maker here of the European Issue contained in the Obi here, to be sure though :)
However, I remain unconvinced, for the following reasons:
This has been entered as Singapore, not Taiwan... And while they appear to be the same release, I would venture to suggest the discogs entry is wrong, for the reason that it states in notes there that their Taiwan release, is a European release, simply wrapped in a Taiwan Obi...
...But the back cover text is not in any official European language (It's the same as this), and I don't think a European issue would have Taiwanese anywhere on it, even if it had selected English translations (song titles, artist names etc.). The only explanation I can think of as to why the discogs entry shows this in notes, contrary to the images provided, is if someone else added a Taiwan specific set of images after the original entry was made, by someone who had a European issue in a Taiwan Obi (perhaps the Taiwan issue wasn't ready yet, so a "patch job", temporary issue was made by simply wrapping European issues in the appropriate obi, until the proper one was available (?)
In any event, On the images provided both there and here, I still can't see Polar by name, in English, or it's logo (which is odd - given that it does give Universal's) on the images... This could only be the case if the original entry maker there, with the European issue, had Polar on that European issue, which later added images don't.
Still perfectly possible that the (Taiwanese (?)) text on images here and there state "Polar", but it doesn't add up, given what I previously said about Universal - why one, and not the other?