@Gregs45s
Sorry Greg the choice was made only in relation to the sharpness of the images, however as regards the image 362552 (rear tray and spines) you are absolutely right, it is my oversight.
Here now all the hidden images have been restored, obviously there is a little more confusion.
Thank you for your precise accuracy:)
@robozuc
Hi,may i ask why image 362551 has been replaced by 1921381,and why images 362552/3/1921392 have been also hidden?(one is with spines),only,if it's an improvement,i'd understand,but if it's just a colour variation,then surely the original submitter's entry should stand,and any colour variations be added to the original entry as "colour variations"?,at least,that's how it's always been,as often,the images from scanner itself will vary from manufacturer to manufacturer,and that has to be taken into account,so many "colour" variations are really just different results from using different scanners.Only i like to think i'm quite careful when adding scans,and make sure the scan is an accurate representation of the colour,so the other scans added here are either a genuine colour variation,or a scanner variation,in which case,all should still be shown surely?
you see don't i;)