CD Album - Rodney Crowell - Fate's Right Hand - Epic

CD Album

Artist:	Rodney Crowell
Title:	Fate's Right Hand
Label:	Epic / DMZ
Country:	USA
Date:	2003
Catalogue:	EK 89082
Barcode:	696998908222
Format:	CD Album
Collection:	I Own It I Want It
Community:	1 Owns
Price Guide:	Valuation Page
» Search eBay #AD » Search Amazon #AD This site contains affiliate links for which we may be compensated.

PRICE GUIDE

Add Valuation

Track	Artist	Title	Composer	Rating
01	Rodney Crowell	Still Learning How To Fly	Rodney Crowell	Rate
02	Rodney Crowell	Fate's Right Hand	Rodney Crowell	10.0 Rate
03	Rodney Crowell	Earthbound	Rodney Crowell	Rate
04	Rodney Crowell	Time To Go Inward	Rodney Crowell	Rate
05	Rodney Crowell	The Man In Me	Rodney Crowell	Rate
06	Rodney Crowell	Ridin' Out The Storm	Rodney Crowell	Rate
07	Rodney Crowell	Preachin' To The Choir	Rodney Crowell	Rate
08	Rodney Crowell	It's A Different World Now	Rodney Crowell	Rate
09	Rodney Crowell	Come On Funny Feelin'	Rodney Crowell	Rate
10	Rodney Crowell	Adam's Song	Rodney Crowell	Rate
11	Rodney Crowell	This Too Will Pass	Rodney Crowell	Rate

Notes

Produced by Rodney Crowell and Pete Coleman

2 Panel Digipak with 4 panel insert
℗ © 2003 Sony Music Entertainment Inc. and DMZ Records
Manufactured by Epic. A Division of Sony Music

An alternate version exists with different barcode: 886974928225

Images

Comments and Reviews


Beggars Road 5th Sep 2017		@Magic Marmalade: Clicked 'I Own It' and posted a few comments for you double M.



Magic Marmalade 5th Sep 2017		New entry created, and each entry has a an allusion to the other in notes. (I'll also link it below) ...So if you want to go ahead and "own" that one BR.



Magic Marmalade 5th Sep 2017		I'm not quoting anyone BR, just stating logic, and for a practical reason too... ... If we have two digipak CDs from the same country, released at the same time, but with no 'apparent' substantive difference, then why do they have two different barcodes? I can't think of (or imagine) why any producer of any product would release two identical products bearing two (or more) different codes - the information contained in the barcode (although, admittedly, I'm no expert) tells you what the product is, and for what market. Although the potential variations on this many digits allows enough scope for millions of diffferently distinguished products, if this practice was carried through to all items bearing barcodes, then they'd very quickly burn through all the potentai variations that this barcode system allows... it's not very efficient, it's time consuming, and costs money to do. (not to mention needlessly confusing, defeating the object of having a code that identifies the product, and any individual copies of that particular product) So, why there may not, as yet, be any apparent distinction in the substance of the two copies here, there must be something different, that this barcode variation is significant of... either something on the disc (music, data, video, etc.), the packaging, made for a different market, or something, at least, that explains it. At a stretch, it could be that the initial release was immediately cancelled, or aborted, and almost as immediatley reinstated, but had, for commercial barcode reasons, had to have a new code applied. The only thingn which will tell you if the music on disc is different is the matrix on the inner ring, so that would be the first port of call, once the packaging has been looked at. Failing this, I'd say the most likely reason is that one was made at the same place, for another country / region / zone / market. (export). In any event, it's different. The practical reasons, as far as this site is concerned, centres around the fact that when going to search for a copy that someone may have in hand, they may first type in the artist, and get their complete listings, or catalogue number, and see a copy that generally matches that, except the barcode... and so, they will enter it again, thinking there's is not this issue (each page can only support one barcode in the barcode field.... and if they do re-enter it, you then have two pages with the same "variation" on it - one leading, one buried in another entry, under a different barcode... this way, duplicates lie. So I think there is a difference, or a reason for that difference, which bears investigation, and the reason established... and this should be reflected here in having two separate entries, which people can readily identify. (Aren't CDs fun?!!! you get one "fact" established, then something comes along that seems to say: "What d'yer make of that then?!!!") I'll make the new entry a little later, and move your images over, but won't be bale to shift your "own" over, as it'll take everyone's over too.



Beggars Road 5th Sep 2017		@Magic Marmalade: "But where a CD has a barcode, and another comes along with a different barcode, they should be entered separately, as there is some substantive change or alteration in the product, which the barcode change is significant of." - What is the source of your quote, please? @Magic Marmalade: Yes, I'd prefer that you make the entry and move the images - thank you very much. @robozuc: My copy of this CD is no 'special edition'.



Magic Marmalade 4th Sep 2017		Yours is a different issue Beggars Road - different product - this is why it has a different barcode. It will need to be made a separate entry, which, if you want to do, I'll shift your images over one it's created, or I could make the entry and move the images if you'd prefer. Recap: A CD with no barcode can appear on the same page as one with, provided all other details are the same (it's the same issue, but with additional information applied, for reasons of compliance with existing commercial practices external to the record company's cataloguing, issuing system).... But where a CD has a barcode, and another comes along with a different barcode, they should be entered separately, as there is some substantive change or alteration in the product, which the barcode change is significant of.



robozuc 4th Sep 2017		Probably here we have two different versions of the same CD: barcode 696998908222 normal cd edition barcode 886974928225 enhanced cd with video material playable on PC My question is, given the two different barcodes, Enhanced CD can be considered a Special Edition? Obviously, they are two different products and need two separate entries.



Beggars Road 4th Sep 2017		To all American workers - enjoy your Labor Day!



Beggars Road 4th Sep 2017		@Alenko: Nope - I'm good - thanx for caring though!



Alenko 4th Sep 2017		Well, maybe it's time to get different mentor



Beggars Road 4th Sep 2017		@Alenko: Good to see your comment/opinion - again. FYI: Before I did it this way I consulted my mentor Moderator - would you like to take it up with him?



Alenko 4th Sep 2017		Different barcode means different issue. If the info on the release you hold in your hands doesn't match info added to the release here, that probably means that you have different issue and that you should add it as separate release.



Beggars Road 4th Sep 2017		Added images of identical entry w/ diff. UPC/barcode. Submitted 'Make Correction' to add diff barcode to Notes.

Add a Comment or Review about this CD

Linked Releases

Europe - Epic - 2003

USA - Epic - 2003