Lee, I know there is a German made version of this. i sold a lot in my record shop, but I doubt if it has the same barcode. If so the red eye release must be made international, otherwise we have a red eye from Europe. The buzzcocks should be International as you entered it correctly first.
Well, leonard why then was my listing of Buzzcocks https://www.45worlds.com/cdalbum/cd/724385702624&rc=153961#153961 changed bya MOD to Australia when I listed it as International on the strength of a discogs listing of the same CD with same cat# and barcode being released in the UK. I took time to check here http://www.discogs.com/Buzzcocks-Chronology/master/758701 before listing it only to have it changed by a MOD. Alternately, some MODS view all CD's marketed in Australasia (Australia and New Zealand) as international regardless of label because the same CD is available in more than one counrtry with the same details. Frankly, I don't care what the answer is, all I would like is some consistency from the MODS because depending on who moderates a CD determines where it goes rather than any criteria at the moment. By the way there is a German version of this with the same cat# but I can't find the barcode if that were to be the same then this should also be international is this correct?
I think it's really simple: if something has the same catalog number and barcode we place things together, if not they get a seperate entry. For the country we choose where the label is from: Red Eye is Australian, but there can (and will be) also European entries if barcode and/or catnumbers differ. Ace and Edsel are from the UK, Bear Family is from Germany although all three can be obtained all over the world. There are no strict rules, the only way to avoid such discussions is to have no country designation at all and only look at products as such.