|
Magic Marmalade 10th Oct 2016
| | I don't think this is international, I think this entry is correct as it is, maybe with the possiblity of it being a bootleg (?) instead of listed as Argentina.
...unless it's an official unofficial release (no, I've no idea what that means either :) |
|
|
|
gregs45s SUBS 10th Oct 2016
| | Ahh but remember MM,that to qualify it for an International release,both releases must have exactly the same label/Cat.No./barcode combination,otherwise they are separated;) |
|
|
|
Magic Marmalade 10th Oct 2016
| | But if this Argentinian disc was issued in a European cover/case and artwok, the entry would still be correct as it is, both in the entry details referring to the disc, which is here, and in presenting the images of the artwork that came with this disc, even if those elements were intended for another market.
So the same artwork should be featured on both entries.
(It's a shame the Disco-clogs entry for the Argentinian issue (this) doesn't feature the back cover scans to verify... but it does list this as "unofficial") |
|
|
|
gregs45s SUBS 10th Oct 2016
| | Um,i think this has to be separated,there are two different issues here...
an Argentinian one,and a European one,even if the Argentinian one used the European artwork it still needs to be separated as it has a different label...
Argentinian release -
Label / "Lost Diamonds / Capitol "or just "Lost Diamonds"
Cat.No. / "8000 5 2 / ST-731" or just "8000 5 2"
2009
European release -
Label / "Capitol"
Cat.No. / ST-731/SST-731
2004
As you can see by this European example here there is no use of 8000 5 2 |
|
|
|
Magic Marmalade 10th Oct 2016
| | One other thing of note, and which may prove helpful, is that the booklet scan has a ghost image of the original Capitol vinyl label, featuring the original ST-731 cat number... if this is not a Capitiol release, theymay not have permitted anyone, even under licence, to use their catalogue number... "Make yer own yer varmits!!! "
:)
(For this reason, I think the details here are correct as entered, just the additional cat number to be added to the existing one under missing info.. instead of a correction) |
|
|
|
Magic Marmalade 10th Oct 2016
| | It might also be possible that they do belong together in the context of an Argentinian release, if they wanted to just release the European version there, but something requires the disc to have a different cat, maybe to distinguish from another cataloguing system found there...
... so an Argentine specific disc in a European case might just be the norm for this, and so the case could be the same for both, but just the disc has been changed.
This might mean that the cat kab entered was correct, even if he could also be technically wrong at the same time if going by the case and cover.... but the site standard here of going by the label as the lead proves the wise decision, and this may be the proof of that, in offering that distinction. |
|
|
|
gregs45s SUBS 10th Oct 2016
| | Looking at Discogs,images 1165980/81/82 are from the European release (2004 unofficial),and image 1165983 is from the Argentinian release (2009 also unofficial) if that's any help;) |
|
|
|
Magic Marmalade 10th Oct 2016
| | I can see that whoever changed it, did so because they were following the disc/label info, as opposed to the cover info.
...But I wonder if your disc is a match for the cover in this case?
It's odd that the cover doesn't have the disc cat anywhere on it, and vice versa, no cover cat on disc.
Could it be that somehow a different disc than ought to be in this case/cover got into your copy?
...you may have two separate issues in one, in which case moving all images may not be the right solution. (someone may ask for it to be changed back if they have a copy with a different disc in their case). |
|
|
|
kab2112 SUBS ● 10th Oct 2016
| | This entry has been changed since I uploaded it. I entered it as a Capitol European Release.with a different cat# to this. I suggest all the images for this are removed. |
|
|
|
leonard ● 9th Oct 2016
| | Wrong images front/back ? These are the same as ST-731. |
|
|