Cinema - Comments / Reviews by Twistin

Cinema - Comments / Reviews by Twistin

« Member Page

Page 2 of 6 : Previous : Next :

Member	Item		Review/Comment
Twistin 25th Jun 2021		Cinema Pink Flamingos (1972) (1972)	Yes, Criterion has issued so many Waters films, but are missing the most famous one. (And where the hell is "Pat Garrett and Billy the Kid"!!!) In time, it surely will happen.
Twistin 4th May 2021		Cinema Creep Van (2012) (2012)	Rated 4/10 I am not a fan of Troma films for a number of reasons. "Creep Van" is a Detroit-based low-budget Troma wannabe, but it manages to capture all the contrived, unfunny magic of its influences. (Lloyd Kaufman even makes a cameo!) Attempts at humor miss 99% of the time, while the weak cast and their attempts at acting are campy at best and cringe-inducing at worst. The weakest link is the half-baked screenplay which, among other sins, never explains why any of this carnage is happening, instead relying on inconsistencies, plot holes and meandering dialogue. And there are three credited writers! The gorehounds will appreciate the creative kills which are more reminiscent of 80s slashers rather than modern day torture porn and found footage rubbish, but that doesn't forgive the tepid filler that ties it all together. And it's never scary, tension and suspense never make so much as a cameo. Good movie? Not a chance. Loads of gore (no CGI!) with some nudity and mildly twisted sex? Check. I believe Scott McKinlay may have a good film in him one day, but he needs to at least start with a professional script, followed by actual acting talent. "Creep Van" is better than most of those direct-to-video cheapies found on those gutter trash compilations, but that doesn't make it a thumbs up. 8 people found this review helpful. ✔︎ Helpful Review?
Twistin 3rd May 2021		Cinema People I Know (2002) (2002)	LOL! Yep. Southern accents from Hollywouldn't are almost always wrong, they never reference any Southern tongue except for New Orleans (and even then, only the most overstated extreme.) If it's a cheap TV movie or something, I just roll my eyes, but when the major leaguers go there, I have to call them out. Of course the majority of the critics praised Pacino's performance; I must assume they've never been around a real bona fide Southern person before, either. One review I read stated that the character's accent was a mix of Southern, homosexual and New York. Is there a homosexual accent? And yes, all the examples you noted are one-size-fits-all token accents from an industry that doesn't get out much. ;-)
Twistin 24th Apr 2021		Cinema Mortuary (2005) (2005)	Rated 7/10 A lot of people don't care for this film and dismiss it on points which are largely misunderstood. It's not a horror film that lacks logic, believability and sufficient tension. It's another of Tobe Hooper's satirical dissections of the family unit cloaked in outrageous horror tropes. Mind you, "Mortuary" has its share of flaws (notably some poor CGI during the film's climax) , but it's also entertaining in a manner not unlike Hooper's "Eaten Alive", "Poltergeist" and even "The Funhouse", just ramped up a bit more on its own absurdist terms. If you watch "Mortuary" from this perspective, you will appreciate the sometimes laugh-out-loud humor rather than abolish the whimsical direction which is misconstrued as serious horror. Lighten up, horror fans. Even "The Texas Chain Saw Massacre" frequently snickered at its own fearful premise. 7 people found this review helpful. ✔︎ Helpful Review?
Twistin 22nd Apr 2021		Cinema Who Loves The Sun (2006) (2006)	Rated 6/10 Interesting character study that seems to promote the misguided notion that if a wife screws around and has sex with another guy, the husband should get over it. The wife's reason? "Because I wanted to." The screenplay repeats the mantra that the man who walks away from such a situation is the asshole. Solid cast and all the technical aspects are bulletproof, but the crazy free love heart of the film is so hippy dippy and unrealistic that it sabotages what should have been a deep and introspective piece of work. It's worth watching, in spite of the foolish concepts. 7 people found this review helpful. ✔︎ Helpful Review?
Twistin 11th Apr 2021		Cinema Manhandled (1949)	Rated 6/10 Manhandled could so easily have become a servicable slice of film noir, but instead only gives us a few references to that genre, opting instead to bursts of tongue-in-cheek humor and ham-fisted crime investigations. The film opens with a tasty murder sequence, as a writer (Alan Napier) is explaining to his psychiatrist that this is a recurring dream that has been troubling him. Even in 1949, one would know better than to reveal such a dream to anyone, let alone a shrink with his new secretary (Dorothy Lamour) standing by jotting down notes of the session. That is typical of the implausibility that routinely plagues the storyline. Later, a detective and insurance investigator casually pop pills to test a suspect's story, that taking amphetamines before barbituates will counteract the effect. According to the script, it does. Many lame plot devices later, it's still a fairly entertaining b-movie that doesn't even try to rise any higher than pulp fluff. 5 people found this review helpful. ✔︎ Helpful Review?
Twistin 11th Apr 2021		Cinema Outrage (2009)	Rated 4/10 Had this been an even-handed film about the role of politicians and their power to vote on issues affecting gay Americans, it would have been fascinating. The topic is ripe for exploration and many valid points are worthy of an investigative approach. Sadly, "Outrage" is yet another partisan hit piece disguised as a balanced documentary. I am anti-partisan and have little use for the two main USA parties destroying each other, never mind their inane movies that posture their talking points into self aggrandizing set pieces. I feared this might be one of them, but only gave it a chance because the DVD cleverly twisted around the description. (Oh, I'm sure they meant well...) The film itself tries very hard to appear unbiased and untethered to any political party. Even a couple of Democrat representatives are outed. And throughout, there are some intriguing discoveries and compelling stories that keep you interested. In the first half, I believed I was watching what I was promised. But somewhere near the middle, the topics become more focused on Republicans than closeted homosexuals and their perplexing bill sponsorships. The last reel or so digs its heels in over the controversial Defense of Marriage Act, which defined marriage as a union between a man and a woman. This bill and its supporters are described by all interviewees as "anti-gay". Like everything else in the film, it's a one-sided issue and no defender of that bill is given the floor to explain their rationale -- which is what a serious documentary would do, expose both sides of the coin. Needless to say, every targeted politician shown are Republicans and are regularly defined here as "anti-gay" for their stance. And yet the film never makes note that the bill was signed into law in 1996 by Democratic president, Bill Clinton (who was also responsible for the "don't ask, don't tell" military policy.) No mention that Hillary Clinton also supported that bill, and during her 2000 Senate race said "...I think a marriage is as a marriage has always been, between a man and a woman." No mention that Barack Obama during his first presidential run also stated that he did not support same-sex marriage. Lastly, I have gay friends who did not support same-sex marriages, but rather civil unions which gave them the same federal rights and benefits as marriage. That stance is not "anti-gay", yet this dishonest film could not be bothered to address this because of its partisan agenda. (yawn) My issue here is not with any of the stances of the above noted politicians, it's the fact that this pseudo documentary conveniently left these important notes out because it might, I don't know, cause damage to some of their heroes? And yet Reagan and particularly George W. Bush are called out boldly for the exact same views. I didn't need to waste 89 minutes to find out that some filmmaker likes one party and dislikes the other, innovative and clever as that idea might be to him and other fans of discourse. And thus, I don't believe it's possible to find an unbiased American political documentary. Watching grass grow is more riveting (and more honest.) 4 people found this review helpful. ✔︎ Helpful Review?
Twistin 9th Apr 2021		Cinema -30- (Deadline Midnight) (1959) (1959)	Rated 6/10 Entertaining, albeit absurd depiction of a newsroom. I've been around newspaper offices off and on most of my life from spelling bee tours as a youth (before achievement was considered politically incorrect), composing advertisements in my teens, and years of slogging through work in layout and camera rooms. Maybe things were different in the 50's, but I never saw a bunch of characters strutting around making endless speeches about the newspaper game with tongues-in-cheek so deep they must have pulled muscles. No, this is closer to the style of drama Jack Webb is best known for on his TV series, Dragnet. Corny but mildly entertaining. There's a whole bunch of familiar faces in the cast, the lot of them chewing so much scenery that dentists would shudder. William Conrad, in particular, is so animated that his hard-boiled city desk editor is played for comedic relief. Fact is, only the subplot about the missing girl attempts any real drama, but ends up as melodrama. Add gobs of sentiment to the other subplot about Webb's character not wanting to adopt a child. If nothing else, the production values are clean as a whistle and the polished black and white lens work is lean and efficient. So nuke up some popcorn and queue up the pseudo noir stylings Mark VII Ltd. was best known for. 7 people found this review helpful. ✔︎ Helpful Review?
Twistin 9th Apr 2021		Cinema The Scorpion King 2: Rise Of A Warrior (2008) (2008)	I added the correct title to the DVD as an additional title, so it's here now.
Twistin 8th Apr 2021		Cinema The Scorpion King 2: Rise Of A Warrior (2008) (2008)	Title screen is more reliable than IMDb.
Twistin 5th Apr 2021		Cinema On The Waterfront (1954) (1954)	I'm not a moderator, I submitted a correction stating that I uploaded the upgrade. In fact, I often see upgrades posted by other users which haven't been switched up (including from you) which I then submit corrections for so that they can flip the images because mods don't typically see them unless that is done. I believe they hide the replaced item to avoid that confusion, yet still keep it here rather than deleting it (unless it's replacing a poor quality image.)
Twistin 5th Apr 2021		Cinema On The Waterfront (1954) (1954)	Is it important that the original image uploader know that an upgrade has been added? This was simply an upgrade, just as happens when a trailer title is replaced with the proper title screen. The description need only state what the image is, noting it is an upgrade in the description is meaningless to most users. The fact that it is Blu-ray is only relevant in that the source was higher resolution and thus, clearer (and the slight black bars on the sides are not present in the upgrade). Look, I didn't know that submitting an upgrade was going to be such a source of consternation with the original uploader. I don't understand the possessive attitude about a submitted title screen. I am only trying to share the best source image I can -- not to compete with and one-up any user. In the future, I'll not touch any of your contributions. Who knew an added a title screen could become such a sore spot. All the drama online, I'm spent.
Twistin 4th Apr 2021		Cinema On The Waterfront (1954) (1954)	This title screen is in the theatrical 1.66:1 widescreen (from the Criterion Blu-ray); the previous screen was 1.25:1 (almost 4:3).
Twistin 4th Apr 2021		Cinema Treasure Island (1999)	I realize that, but again, it's not a British production, it's a Canada / UK co-production. It appears to be top-heavy on the Canadian side and since the (North American) DVD and Blu-ray releases frame it at 1.85:1, it seems unlikely that they change that from region to region. I have seen no indication online of this film identified with that aspect ratio. The UK DVD release from ILC Group... https://www.amazon.co.uk/Treasure-Island-DVD-Jack-Palance/dp/B00004T8VM ...says it is "full screen", which means 1.33:1. IMDb doesn't even show a UK release date, so it's possible it never had a theatrical release there. This is just speculation based on what I have found online, but the crumbs do seem to lead in one direction over the other.
Twistin 3rd Apr 2021		Cinema Treasure Island (1999)	Well, it's actually a Canada / UK production. And on this page: https://www.blu-ray.com/dvd/Treasure-Island-DVD/136406/ the DVD release is listed as theatrical 1.85:1, DVD 1.78:1 -- a common extension from theatrical aspect ratio to 16:9 home video widescreen (each cropped from 1.33:1 camera A/R.) Likewise for the Blu-ray: https://www.blu-ray.com/movies/Treasure-Island-Blu-ray/49350/ Both A/R's used the same 1.33:1 print and an aperture plate on the projector to crop the image (except on hard-matted prints). Anyway, given the theatrical release dates and the fact that two of the three lead cast (and the director) are North American, it seems the primary target audience was North America and an appropriately adapted A/R would have been the default standard.
Twistin 3rd Apr 2021		Cinema Treasure Island (1999)	Almost certainly it was shot in 1.33:1 (4:3) and was masked to 1.85:1 in its theatrical run. A lot of films shot and projected that way were released on home video in 4:3, but if you look at the opening credits, they avoid the top and bottom areas so that when masked, the text is not affected. I watched the first five minutes of this film with the top & bottom area cropped to 16:9 and it seems clear that the film was composed for a 1.85:1 display (or possibly, but less likely, 1.66:1 which most North American theaters were not setup to display properly.)
Twistin 2nd Apr 2021		Cinema The Werewolf Of Woodstock (1975) (1975)	Rated 8/10 Just wow! A long-lost classic. This made-for-TV feature from the pairing of ABC-TV & Dick Clark Productions, was from a period when TV was attempting to capture that new 70s rock audience. The team had previous success with the late night Friday audience (no school on Saturday!) and the series, "In Concert" in 1972, the year NBC introduced "Saturday Night Live" to their late night weekend schedule. Both tried to nick viewers who were otherwise going to late screenings at theaters marketed to the rock & roll drug culture. After NBC grabbed late Saturday, they took over Fridays with "Midnight Special", and the syndicated "Don Kirshner's Rock Concert" also grabbed a chunk, leaving ABC out in the cold. Eventually, the network was left with nothing more than "Dick Clark's New Year's Rockin' Eve" every year, but a last ditch effort was made in 1975 under the name, Wide World Mystery. Using the 'Wide World' prefix from ABC's sports franchise, tacked onto their late night banner, the one and only entry into the series was The Werewolf of Woodstock, a thriller mysteriously shot on videotape rather than film, the second TV-movie shot to tape (the first being "Sandcastles" on CBS, fact fans.) The results in both cases were quite mixed, ultimately failing to achieve any emotional element sans celluloid. All of that said, this is quite a miraculous anomaly, should you manage to get your hands on this rare feature. It's in light circulation in digital bootleg parlors. My guess is that it will be of little interest to the majority, the mainstream lot that they are, at least until an "official" fan movement for a film begins. So if one of those teenybopper magazines like Spin or Rolling Stone tells the kiddies to seek out this film, it could be the next The Room. And if there's any real punk misfits left, you need this flick in your weed-stenched home theater. 4 people found this review helpful. ✔︎ Helpful Review?
Twistin 1st Apr 2021		Cinema Sleazy Rider (1972) (1972)	Rated 1/10 A poor excuse for pornography that tries to elevate itself by being a regular movie with x-rated conventions. While it barely earns its x-rating, it fails across the board in every aspect of filmmaking. As a biker movie, it's slow and uninvolving, helped along by the grade Z acting and tepid excuse for a storyline (sheriff pulls over bikers, feels up the women, then leaves, bikers want revenge.) Then there's the "porn", staid nudity and poorly simulated sex scenes. I laughed out loud through most of the (thankfully short) hour duration. Even the casual drug use is limited to what looks like the Ozark Mountain Daredevils smoking grass. The ending is an unbelievably inept cop-out. And its nowhere near as sleazy as you might expect, other than the fact that there's nothing here even remotely sexy. Cheezy Rider might have been a more appropriate title. 2 people found this review helpful. ✔︎ Helpful Review?
Twistin 31st Mar 2021		Cinema Carnival Magic (1983) (1983)	Rated 4/10 Jeez, where to begin! Made at the tail end of Al Adamson's freaky career, Carnival Magic was never released and was only discovered after his death when police searched his residence (another freaky situation on its own.) From the opening credits, you know you're in for sloppy incompetence. It's the only film I've seen where the final credit is not the director, but the producer, which may be a quibble, but it's just not done. After the end credits are superimposed over a local parade, the screen turns black and text appears announcing that next summer will be a sequel, More Carnival Magic (!) as a vocal music number begins, only to drop out and fade away a few seconds later. Huh? Mind you, I'm not sharing any of the ineptitude from the actual movie itself, mainly because it's boring -- and sometimes wildly inappropriate, especially for what appears to have been aimed at an audience of tykes?!? As it all unfolded (slowly), I kept thinking how hokey it all was, like the many local films produced in the area where I live. Lo and behold, it actually was shot in my backyard, which explains plenty. Coupling that with the already questionable skills of Sir Adamson and the end result is one of Al's more bumbling efforts. It's been several years since I watched this and my biggest memory is just hating the damn thing. How I awarded it a whopping 4 stars is as much a mystery as the film itself. 8 people found this review helpful. ✔︎ Helpful Review?
Twistin 31st Mar 2021		Cinema Cool It (2010) (2010)	Please use IMDb for release date info (on the Release Date page, not the film's main page.)
Twistin 25th Mar 2021		Cinema Devil's Angels (1967) (1967)	"The Checkered Flag", which refers to the flag signifying the end of a car race, has nothing to do with the story in this (or any other biker film I am aware of.) Wikipedia is the only source that claims such an aka and even on that very Wikipedia page, it states (at the top): "This article needs additional citations for verification [...]" None of the three sources on that page suggest any alternate title, and none of those contain links for verification. After countless Google searches, not one reliable site could confirm that aka, almost all being verbatim copy & paste of the text on Wikipedia ("Devil's Angels (also known as The Checkered Flag) is a 1967 American outlaw biker film written by Charles B. Griffith and directed by Daniel Haller.") Hence, that is merely an unsourced error. Furthermore, the Note above which states, "A follow up to "The Wild Angels" is also incorrect, or at the very least, misleading since it suggest "Devil's Angels" (the film) as a follow-up to "The Wild Angels" (film). It was American International Pictures' followup to the biker genre, which is not even noteworthy. Again, the culprit here seems to be rooted in Wikipedia on their page for "The Wild Angels", although it seems more clear there than it is presented on this page. Wikipedia is not the best source for "details" like these, especially if these cannot be verified elsewhere (save sites that harvest data from Wikipedia itself.) :
Twistin 24th Mar 2021		Cinema Devil's Angels (1967) (1967)	"The Checkered Flag"? Where is this listed as an aka for this film?
Twistin 21st Feb 2021		Cinema The Monuments Men (2014) (2014)	Why would black bars be needed on a title screen? They only exist because 16:9 screens are 1.78:1 and thus a 2.35:1 display has the bars due to screen size - not intended as part of the original (theatrical) screen.
Twistin 7th Feb 2021		Cinema Made In USA (1987) (1987)	Rated 2/10 What a completely STUPID movie. Way back when, I unsuccessfully tried to locate this film because I had a thing for Lori Singer (well, the 80s version of her, anyway...) Seeing the film now, she looks like a caricature of 80s MTV, pretty but soooo back then. But that has no bearing on the poorness of the film itself. Dar & Tuck are two losers in a small town in Pennsylvania who decide to "drop out", and hit the road so Dar can find a pin-up girl from a surfer magazine, stealing cars and various petty crimes along the way for kicks. And thus, the setup for a road movie, which no doubt seemed like a great artsy, Cannes-y vehicle for our rebellious young director, Ken Friedman. In practice, it comes off like someone got stoned listening to a Timbuk 3 album and decided to make a movie based on the way the record made them feel. Sounds ridiculous, but that's the way it looks. There's not even a convincing existentialist undercurrent. In fact, within 15 minutes, I was ready (and hoping) for our heroes to crash into bulldozers or something. The worst part is around the midway point where we're supposed to find sympathy for the characters, as the crazy Annie rebel chick is seen in tears hugging an Indian woman for no real reason in some greasy spoon restaurant. A link to Indians plopped down on top of the non-story (and it keeps aimlessly building on this subplot!) There's more useless diversions, like Dioxin poisoning, that hang on as long as possible before detouring. No issues addressed, just diluted references randomly fading in and out. How cutting edge. Or the result of the edited cut of the film, following some chaos after the Cannes screening. Apparently this was intended to be a poetic diatribe about ecological concerns, but what we get is a screed in wolf's clothing. (There is a wolf in the film, yet another foolish misstep.) The only bright spot is the music, even if it's wasted on contrived visuals. A mixed bag of tunes from Sonic Youth, John Hiatt, Phil Ochs, The Rubinoos (!), Mojo Nixon / Skid Roper, Rick Cunha, and World Party, among others. I suspect this virtually invisible film will one day develop a cult following, as soon as some hip director says he was influenced by it. There will be 10-star grades weighing heavy on the IMDb score, and will reside on lists with smart names like 1987, while reviews will drop such clever quotes as "Bad hair, dude." But today, I have peace knowing that sometimes a turd is just a turd, and few have heard of "Made in U.S.A." because it truly is wretched. 4 people found this review helpful. ✔︎ Helpful Review?
Twistin 7th Feb 2021		Cinema The Little Girl Who Lives Down The Lane (1976) (1976)	Rated 7/10 Not as compelling (or entertaining) as the book, but a passable little thriller. The casting in particular makes this work, with strong performances from Foster, Sheen, and Jacoby, although this is not one of Jodie's favs, for good reasons. Not so much a keeper, but worth watching once. 4 people found this review helpful. ✔︎ Helpful Review?
Twistin 21st Jan 2021		Cinema Elizabethtown (2005) (2005)	Rated 5/10 The hopeless romantic in me wanted to love this almost paint-by-numbers comedy-drama. I knew the critics were unimpressed, but I don't mind the monotony that the intelligentsia so loathe. I even looked forward to swimming upstream of their jaded dismissals of life, love and the human condition. I stayed true to this defiance for the majority of Elizabethtown, but as the final act wrapped up the loose ends, I found myself in that crucial aha! moment. Everything I loved about the film was tossed away into the miasmic stench of sentimental denouement. I felt as if I was in a relationship, each day filled with discovery and fulfillment until the facade revealed itself just when I'm ready to commit. Love gone spoiled sour. I'll dispense with the storyline and characters since I don't want to give the impression of recommending this affair. Anyway, those details are easily attainable, so instead, a brief plus & minus bit: Strengths: · charming Southern quirks in small town USA · humorous side characters that don't overplay their hand Weaknesses: · being pummeled with greeting card philosophies · a soundtrack that feels like a playlist from a smug Rolling Stone magazine list-maker The road trip home caused my grade to start its descent, ultimately flipping from 8 stars to 5 by the time Drew is baptized by the history of Memphis -- a sequence so hackneyed that I had to turn away from the sacrificial (and predictable) lessons. Better stick with the Hallmark rom-coms, at least they have the courtesy to wallow in their banality instead of springing it on you like a jack-in-the-box. 8 people found this review helpful. ✔︎ Helpful Review?
Twistin 6th Jan 2021		Cinema En Som Hodder (Someone Like Hodder) (2003) (2003)	Rated 10/10 Ineffably sweet, but also incredibly sad. The anchor of the film is young Hodder's unyielding optimism even when faced with cruelty and melancholy. The main cast is perfect, and none of the characters are reduced to easy, one-dimensional caricatures. Finally, the music soundtrack cannot be ignored. For a family film, it's quite profound and moving. 7 people found this review helpful. ✔︎ Helpful Review?
Twistin 30th Dec 2020		Cinema Dirty Weekend (1993)	I always liked Michael Winner's 60s and especially 70s output, but Death Wish just left a bad taste in my mouth. Probably due to the savage abuse of Mrs. Muir by the home invasion thugs.
Twistin 27th Dec 2020		Cinema Naughty Network (1981) (1981)	Rated 8/10 Most pornography doesn't really belong in a film database, since it's just a collection of sex acts on film, the idea being to stimulate, not entertain. At some point in the 60s, several hardcore films decided to experiment with actual plots and characters. Mixed reactions, depending on whether one wanted interferences with one's...erm, stimulation. Personally, non-stop sex + extreme close-ups are too much. In the 70s, filmmakers stepped it up with a variety of subjects, which continued through to the latter part of the 80s. Once the video medium became the standard delivery mechanism, the renaissance ended. One of the beacons of the era was 1974's Flesh Gordon, an erotic send-up of the 1936 Buster Crabbe serial, Flash Gordon. Director Howard Ziehm already had a fistful of adult films under his belt using the pseudonym Harry Hopper, but Flesh Gordon put him on the map. He continued making adult films under various names, ending his career with his final film in 1990, Flesh Gordon Meets the Cosmic Cheerleaders. One of his fake names was Linus Gator, which he used for Naughty Network, a send up of television featuring segments such as "Genital Hospital" (General Hospital), "TRASH" (MASH), and "The Young and the Horny" (The Young and the Restless). The TV station airing these shows is WHAC. Considering the genre, it's well shot, funny, and yes, erotic. Particularly the "Wild & Crazy Kingdom" segment. Obviously if you don't like adult films, you'll want to steer clear. But if you like your blue movies with an ornamental edge, you could do a lot worse than Naughty Network*. 7 people found this review helpful. ✔︎ Helpful Review?
Twistin 27th Dec 2020		Cinema 31 (2016) (2016)	Rated 1/10 Rob Zombie is about as cutting edge as an episode of "Joanie Loves Chachi". As usual, we get a "thriller" bereft of any original ideas and bankrupt of any vocabulary shy of the f-word. I keep hoping each of his films will be his last. I keep watching them in the futile hope that Zombie will come up with any idea of his own, which may release him from the obligation of reviving the careers of oldschool actors (hey - great idea, Rob! You should try to get a Sweathog in one of your films!...and be sure to populate it with a smart, edgy soundtrack replete with a mix of classic rock and obscure oldies...how about a disc jockey thrown in for no good reason.) Ultimately, we are left with enough misdirection to completely distract from the emaciated excuse for a storyline and from there, a withered leaflet of brutal kills. 8 people found this review helpful. ✔︎ Helpful Review?

Page 2 of 6 : Previous : Next :