Mulholland Drive

English Title:	Mulholland Dr.
Year:	2001
Country:	USA
Language:	English
Genre:	Drama, Thriller, Mystery
IMDB:	IMDB Page
Rating:	8.3 Rate
Collection:	Seen It Wishlist
Community:	14 Have Seen


Director	David Lynch
Selected Cast	Naomi Watts as Betty / Diane Selwyn
	Justin Theroux as Adam
	Laura Harring as Rita / Camilia Rhodes
	Ann Miller as Coco
	Brent Briscoe as Detective Domgaard
	Dan Hedaya as Vincenzo Castigliane
	Mark Pellegrino as Joe
	Robert Forster as Detective McKnight
	Michael J. Anderson as Mr. Roque
	Melissa George as Camilla Rhodes
	Michael Des Barres as Billy
	Billy Ray Cyrus as Gene
	Tony Longo as Kenny
	Lee Grant as Louise Bonner
	Chad Everett as Jimmy Katz
Producer	Mary Sweeney
	Alain Sarde
	Neal Edelstein
	Michael Polaire
	Tony Krantz
Writer	David Lynch
Soundtrack	Angelo Badalamenti

On DVD & Blu-ray World

DVD

Mulholland Dr. - Universal - USA (2002)

DVD

Mulholland Drive - A-Film - Netherlands (2005)

DVD

Mulholland Drive - Manga Home Video - Spain (2002)

DVD

Mulholland Drive - Atalanta Filmes - Portugal (2002)

Images

Number: 756209

THUMBNAIL
Uploaded By: leonard
Description: title

Number: 3279683

Uploaded By: zabadak
Description: poster

Number: 3424789

Uploaded By: zabadak
Description: poster

Comments and Reviews


Magic Marmalade 5th Jan 2024		Rated 8/10 *Unfortunately, nobody can be told* what Mulholland Drive is... You have to see it for yourself. ...Oh, sorry, that's the Matrix, isn't it?!! (That said, that line in The Matrix always bugged me - clever marketing though it was - as you decidedly can tell someone what it is, if you sit down for five minutes and explain to poor Neo, rather than making him jump straight in... not to mention the fact that Morpheus then proceeds to spend fifteen minutes or so of the movie doing just that.. after Neo has committed. Bastard!) ((But I digress! :)) Actually, that is certainly applicable tot his movie, as the reputation it has is a mix of: It's the greatest movie ever made, or conversely: It's the worst movie ever made... A streaming pile of incoherent sh..... The truth is, it's both, and deliberately so, I divined, from watching it the other day for the first time, and that is what may make this a work of genius. To explain: Although, exactly what this film is about, and the meaning of it may be open to many an interpretation, and perhaps no definitive point can be arrived at (I have my own thoughts, for later :), how it does it... goes about telling this story, whatever it is, is a little clearer on reflection. For, from the opening, this is reeking with Twin Peaks look and feel, like it was made for TV in the early nineties (I had to check the date of the movie to remind myself of the real date because of this)... only worse. Shonky, jittery soft-ish focus, amateurish camera work with a forced, contrived script, with forced, contrived dialogue, played by the most wooden, artificial performances from a collection of the most wooden, artificial actors Lynch could find. It feels like a cross between low budget 70s porn acting and staging, and early nineties television pilots with ridiculous melodramatic plotting and absurd coincidental events. You think, from the off: man, "this is the most shit movie I have ever seen!" (And what a shame it's Lynch too!) I can see this movie losing 90% of it's audience in the first ten minutes, because of this.. who could just take no more, and would in reality, or metaphorically, stand up, and walk out of the theatre (Or change channels). But this is a mistake!** As this is purposely done, and in a key scene, where Watts "character" as a young, freshly arrived starlet in Hollywood seeking fame and stardom, auditions for a role in a soap, you get the most real, and naturalistic acting from her you could get. "Aha!... I get it now, this is about perception in media versus reality to some extent" (thinks I) People are more real in fictions than in their "real lives", seems what this story says. And from here, the camera, imperceptibly, and by degrees, straightens up, the production gradually acquiring cinema quality, as does the acting, and the script, and you, the audience member, doesn't consciously perceive it happening. You see the earlier style was a deliberate choice, that says something about.... something. I spite of the Noir-ish ("neo", or otherwise) style and themes (mystery, hallucinatory, oblique symbol heavy, metaphorical affair) I think this actually transcends this, and should rather be regarded as a kind of art installation, or a work of art of some description. I would personally hazard a guess that this is a kind of subconscious, poetic eulogy of sorts to the kind of tragic figure that an Amalgam of Marilyn Monroe and Princess Diana would represent to David Lynch, set against obscure, dark, and sinister, background forces that controls her fate. This hall of mirrors, has at least a couple of characters who may well be the same person, (maybe more!), but is captivating, and quite brilliant if you can persevere through the opening half, so then you later see the brilliance of what you thought, at the beginning, was shit. Not sure I'd hurry back to watch it again immediately - for fun - but once it's rattled about at the back of my brain a while, I think I'd like to revisit it... Meantime, I'll file it away as an impenetrable piece of possible genius right next to 2001: A Space Odyssey, where it belongs :) ✔︎ Helpful Review?



zabadak 1st May 2023		Trailer (nod to jamieeduardo) :happy:



jaimeeduardo 23rd Sep 2020

Add a Comment or Review about this movie

Lists

2022 Sight + Sound: Critics Top 100 Greatest Films Of All Time - 100 Movies - List by Dr Doom

Tags: Hitchcockian, Neo Noir

This Movie: Add Image : Add Video : Add Missing Info : Make Correction : Add to List : Add See Also : Add Tag : Edit Images : Hide Image Data : Credits : BBCode