@ppint: We seem to be in agreement on this
There may have been some confusion between what is appropriate for a Title and what for Artist. I will take the matter up with the divinities.
i've already expressed my opinion as to the sense, or lack thereof, of including non-performing, and frequently dead - sometimes for centuries - composers in the artist(s) field, here on classicalcat - and raised the sense, or lack thereof, as a forums topic 4/6/2015 - where someone, and the only one to have responded when last i looked, advised me 7/6/2015 that this was indeed correct, and desirable, practice, etc, etc.
(i cannot claim that i was convinced by such argument(s) in favour of the practice as they advanced but, as they're of semi-divine status, and as no-one else's expressed an opinion. . .)
(i believe that the confirmation of the practice being the classicalcat way came from gill sans.)
"J. S. Bach, Alexis Weissenberg"
That kind of conjunction would be appropriate for 'Title' but is a nonsense for 'Artist'
Let's have just Alexis Weissenberg, and do forgive me if I edit out the 'Note' which, while it expresses ppint's thinking about Classical World submissions, is not germane to the record or its contents
curious to how J.S. Bach is an Artist here? He the composer of the work, but he doesn't perform it. In popular music you don't credit the songwriter(s) as Artists.