Stereo SXL Catalogue number Series, "Wide Band" unboxed Decca Label.
Laminated front cover sleeve, with insert.
Side One: Songs And Proverbs Of William Blake:
Baritone: Dietrich Fischer-Dieskau
Piano: Benjamin Britten
Side Two: The Holy Sonnets Of John Donne:
Tenor: Peter Pears
Piano: Benjamin Britten
Sleeve Printed by Clout & Baker Ltd.
Later Versions not pressed in UK, and on thinner vinyl with "Boxed" Decca labels
Images
Number:652926 THUMBNAIL Uploaded By:Magic Marmalade Description: Benjamin Britten - Songs And Proverbs Of William Blake / The Holy Sonnets Of John Donne = Front Cover
Number:652927 Uploaded By:Magic Marmalade Description: Benjamin Britten - Songs And Proverbs Of William Blake / The Holy Sonnets Of John Donne - Back Cover
Number:652715 Uploaded By:Magic Marmalade Description: Benjamin Britten - The Songs & Proverbs Of William Blake - Side 1 - "Wide Band" Unboxed Decca Logo
Number:652716 Uploaded By:Magic Marmalade Description: Benjamin Britten - The Holy Sonnets Of John Donne - Side 2 - "Wide Band" unboxed Decca Logo Label
Have to say the vinyl audio quality is as truly exceptional as these Deccas are cracked up to be.
Difficult to tell about the range because this has only one Piano and one singer per side, and the piano is added by Benjamin Britten as a kind of colouring... no extensive solos or anything. The singer's the thing with this disc.
It is as the track listings suggest: a selection of Blake and Donne's poems "sung" fulsomely by baritone and tenor, so no opportunity to hear how a full orchestra going at it would sound, power wise.
However, the sparseness of the arrangement does tell a lot about these pressings, and the recording equipment and techniques of the time; The very best vinyl, absolutely precision pressed (The spindle hole fits super snug on the spindle), and absolutely no vinyl noise... none. It sounds like a CD. Completely silent!
And it is this that highlights the incredible job of recording the artists that they did... This was pressed in 1969, and is contemporary with The Rolling Stones: Let It Bleed album, also on Decca, and I've heard the SACD of that... but this sounds like they recorded it yesterday with modern technology. The almost whispered parts of the songs picked out in immaculate detail, as well as the lower end of Britten's piano playing, and the higher, and more powerful moments handled with ease.
Low end without distortion, highs without brightness or shrillness, space, separation, and zero ambient hiss from the studio.
I now can't wait to get out and find a "bigger" piece, with full orch giving it the beans on one of these Deccas.
(Seems like when it came to the recording kit, and the plastic, The Rolling Stones not only couldn't get what they wanted... the tight gits at Decca didn't even give them what they needed to come close to this... you can only weep as you imagine what Let it Bleed would have sounded like with this kind of attention!)
...Need more like him in the world today... and Lenny Bruce.
True though... most of us look at classical music the same way we look at algebra or calculus (I'm still working on my 5 times table musically speaking).
Just a note on the images for classical music:
I have learned one thing about the whole classical vinyl thing in the last couple of days... and that it's all about the label for classical fans: Deccas must be wide band early stereos, Deutsche Grammophons must be german pressed big tulip rims, and HMVs must have the early cream(White) labels with gold lettering (Or in some instances the red with black semi-circular dog logo for them to begin to get excited... so wonder what people think of the idea of putting the side 1 label as the lead image for entries on classical vinyl?
So if they look at the Decca label page they can pick out the desired labels immediately?
II'm entirely happy for anyone to alter absoluelty any aspect of anything I've entered on site, if it improves the accuracy and quaity of the entry.
It was just making me kinda sad that Classical world has been creeping along llike it has, so, Classical dunce that I am, and on behalf of all Classical dunces, I thought I'd take the "Fools rush in approach" and just throw something at the wall as a contribution.
I think most people have two things in common when it comes to classical music...
One: most people I suspect have at least one classical item around the house (even if by accident, or for a single piece of music that caught their attention at some time).
And Two: They are afraid of it!
I find it a daunting prospect myself... makes me feel like a dog looking at a door knob!
...Maybe that's why they don't want to put anything up here, for fear of making a mistake (As I am).
But if we all just assume the attitude of the quarryman when it comes to sculpting an entry, just blasting out a lump of rock, we can let others be the stonemasons and sculptors... I'm hoping I'll finally learn something about the whole classical thing from here.
(The soloist listing by the way is as you say, I tried to enter it with those names, but it wouldn't let me, and it was either choose one, or opt for the most conspicuous name on the bill, so I went with that).
Where are all the classical experts anyway? I'd have thought one or two would have turned up by now to help us out!
Hi MM, I've added the release month, taken from Decca's 1974 catalogue which has an index of catalogue numbers at the back. I'm not a classical expert, and I'm not trying to dismantle your listing, but I wonder about Britten being entered as soloist when there are two vocal soloists here; perhaps the entry layout needs to be re-jigged to cater for multiple soloists?