Tell me he's lazy, tell me he's slow Member since Jan 2011 4138 Points Moderator
Well, yes-s, it was certainly the 10" 78, and shellac was becoming replaced by vinyl towards the end of the format, so we'd better be careful not to dismiss this out of hand
I'm glad a discerning gentleman such as yourself agrees!
Yes, some charting 78s were vinyl, but not in the "earliest" days of the charts (unless that covers the whole first five years). I personally think it's ignorance though - the earliest charting music was on 10" shellac. No wax was harmed in the making of those discs
I used to have a good memory but now I can't re Member since May 2011 5096 Points Moderator
Even at the end, of all the 78s produced MOST were still not made of vinyl. Lonnie Donegan had a few vinyl records on Pye, but I would say that most records made in the 1950s, if they played at 78rpm, they were made of shellac or a similar very brittle material. This would apply to 78s I own which were manufactured up to about 1958.
Agreed. It was a minority of releases. Petula Clark hits on Pye Nixa were also pressed on 78rpm vinyl. I think the choice of words by the OCC is simply because whoever wrote it isn't aware that early records were actually made of a different material. Easy mistake for a young novice to make, but surely the OCC should know better.
That sounds interesting for collectors... I don't recall seeing it in a Guinness book. "First Hits", the sheet music charts book, lists the formats of all the song releases on record.
The Collector's Collector Member since Feb 2012 3786 Points Moderator
Last year they carried out yet another rewriting of history - claiming that 1952 was the first "official" chart. BALDERDASH! The first singles chart in 1952 was from New Musical Express - and the first "official" chart was published in February 1969.
Last year they carried out yet another rewriting of history - claiming that 1952 was the first "official" chart. BALDERDASH! The first singles chart in 1952 was from New Musical Express - and the first "official" chart was published in February 1969.
That is true. But I suppose the OCC is just referring to their own version of "history". It's more accurate to refer to the "NME chart". From the mid-50s, with multiple magazine charts, until 1969, it's rather questionable to now have one chart being regarded as "definitive". When talking about a hit record from the 60s, this is particularly pertinent.