Very nice reissue, improving on the original's flimsy "envelope" gatefold design, opting here for a "standard" two-opening double lp type format. Vinyl is nice and heavy. Inner sleeves a bit on the flimsy side, but I've seen worse.
One thing though (and this has been noted in reviews), you can't get the bloody inner sleeves out! They must have bollocksed the measurements at the printers, because the inner sleeves sit way too tight in the outer sleeve. Not a life-or-death problem, I agree, but over time all the pulling and shoving will inevitably scuff or bend the sleeves, so it'll end up looking like those knackered, flimsy originals they're asking 30+ quid for these days anyway :-/
Yep, that's the standard Rolling Stones (Records) label design dating back to the label's introduction in 1971, so I think Rolling Stones should be made the label, although I do wonder whether it is truly "active" as a label these days, as both the CBS and Virgin reissues seemed to have those branded as label. However, Polydor could be retained as second label here, to cover both possibilities.
Just wondering whether the label should actually be Rolling Stones, as the tongue logo is on the cover as well as the Polydor one, which might be more of a distributor logo in this instance? What's on the actual record labels?