British export release of the U.S. album. Early copies had the 'KT' tax code imprinted on the label.
|
Record Collector 7th Jan 2015
| | Eeeeek this album has come back to haunt me haha |
|
|
|
Neil Forbes 18th Dec 2014
| | R.C., when you're burning your own CD of this album, or those you've mentioned by The Beach Boys, then yes, you could well design your own front cover, and if your printer has the capability to print onto inkjet-printable discs, then you could be designing your own CD labels as well(providing you've installed the software that came with the printer. For myself, I use a Canon IP-4850 printer with just such capability. Needless to say you would not sell the resultant CD! No way, Jose! You'd have put too much effort into making it to ever part with it! I did exactly that with this album, except I followed the American track order without having any knowledge of this website, because I made my CD copy several years ago. |
|
|
|
Record Collector 18th Dec 2014
| | interesting when you look at beach boys albums like sufing USA and and pet sounds we could have our own custom album releases with different album titles and cover art |
|
|
|
Neil Forbes 18th Dec 2014
| | I'm gonna jump off this site and head over to 45cat. See you there, R.C. |
|
|
|
Neil Forbes 18th Dec 2014
| | R.C. said: "they should have left the record alone and follow the British releases". Most wholeheartedly agree! |
|
|
|
Neil Forbes 18th Dec 2014
| | R.C., it's kinda hard keeping track(no, I didn't intentionally make a pun) of label colours for EMI, singles or LPs, let alone EPs. 20 Explosive Hits on Columbia had black print on a blue label, then you'd see black on orange, Parlophone would be silver-on-black but also black-on-orange, I'd only be guessing, and wild guesses they'd be as well, as to what colour scheme would be used and for which purpose/reason... Ach, it's got me all confused(says me with best fake Scottish accent - Billy Connolly on TV in the background as I type this). |
|
|
|
Record Collector 18th Dec 2014
| | they should have left the record alone and follow the british releases |
|
|
|
Record Collector 18th Dec 2014
| | the black label how it appeared on the Australian copies from 1982 onwards in Australia as we had the orange backround from 1969 until then |
|
|
|
Record Collector 18th Dec 2014
| | oops sorry I ment to say volume one not two |
|
|
|
Neil Forbes 18th Dec 2014
| | EMI Australia used the same photo, R.C. but the title, which you gave, and track listing(not to mention the catalogue number..... aa-ah...told you not to mention the catalogue number[ha-ha]) would be vastly different. |
|
|
|
Record Collector 18th Dec 2014
| | the cover is same as Australian Beatles Greatest Hits volume two Released in late 1966 |
|
|
|
Neil Forbes 18th Dec 2014
| | The cassette I have of this(which I transferred to CD myself) has the tracks in a different order. The issue number was Capitol 4XT-2358 and the track order was: 1.Kansas City; 2.Bad Boy; 3.I Don't Want To Spoil The Party; 4.Words Of Love; 5.What You're Doing; 6.Every Little Thing - Side A; 1.Eight Days A Week; 2.You Like Me Too Much; 3.Yes It Is(in synthetic stereo); 4.Dizzy Miss Lizzie; 5.Tell Me What You See - Side B. This shows The American subsidiary didn't even follow the British track order. The album was intended for export markets, rather than the domestic British market, but still, Capitol should've made the effort and kept the playing order the same, don't you reckon? |
|
|
|
Joehilllouis 17th Dec 2014
| | My copy of 1969 has S 2 T 2451 etched out on the b side. |
|
|