Number:515489 THUMBNAIL Uploaded By:Tony P Description: front cover
Number:515490 Uploaded By:Tony P Description: back cover
Number:515491 Uploaded By:Tony P Description: side 1
Number:515492 Uploaded By:Tony P Description: side 2
Number:1150796 Uploaded By:Magic Marmalade Description: King Oliver - The great 1923 Gennetts - Back Cover Detail - Side 1 Track Listing And 78rpm Cat Numbers
Number:1150797 Uploaded By:Magic Marmalade Description: King Oliver - The great 1923 Gennetts - Back Cover Detail - Side 2 Track Listing And 78rpm Cat Numbers
Number:1150798 Uploaded By:Magic Marmalade Description: King Oliver - The great 1923 Gennetts - Back Cover Detail - Liner Notes - Paragraphs - Part 1
Number:1150799 Uploaded By:Magic Marmalade Description: King Oliver - The great 1923 Gennetts - Back Cover Detail - Liner Notes - Paragraphs - Part 2
Number:1150800 Uploaded By:Magic Marmalade Description: King Oliver - The great 1923 Gennetts - Back Cover Detail - Liner Notes - Paragraphs - Part 3
Number:1150801 Uploaded By:Magic Marmalade Description: King Oliver - The great 1923 Gennetts - Back Cover Detail - Liner Notes - Paragraphs - Part 4
Number:1150802 Uploaded By:Magic Marmalade Description: King Oliver - The great 1923 Gennetts - Back Cover Detail - Liner Notes - Paragraphs - Part 5
Number:1150803 Uploaded By:Magic Marmalade Description: King Oliver - The great 1923 Gennetts - Back Cover Detail - Liner Notes - Photo And Credits
Jazz is difficult in general really... not only do people either love it or loathe it as a music, many either love or loathe particular types of jazz...
...For me, the rule of thumb is that the older it is, the better it is likely to be. But I can listen to anything up probably the mid to late sixties, whereafter it all goes a bit wobbly.
(I have a Chick Corea album I got this year that I find absolutely atrocious)
ReviewJust look at that label, and tell me that wasn't just a sneaky way of calling it: "Heroin"!
(The "w" is written so that it can clearly be seen as an "O")
But this aside..
I got this a t a boot-fair in the summer, as it seemed intriguing, and only last week got it out to listen to and record.
I'm sure that plenty of 78s fans, and Jazz fans will know all about Gennett label discs, and in particular King Oliver on Gennett; How rare these things are, and the associated values of the originals would put them well beyond the reach of ordinary collectors like me, so this disc is a great, and cheap solution.
The back cover detail scans I've uploaded of the liner notes will explain better than I can about the original discs, and how they eventually came to be issued on this album So I'll confine myself to this particular issue:
It was a bit disconcerting at first, having spent a good while cleaning what looked like a very good condition disc, to hear a crackle and pop when I placed the needle on the disc and commenced the recording.... but after a couple of times stopping my recording, and re-cleaning, apparently to no avail, I decided just to let it go as was... and only realising, in the run between tracks, when the crackle dropped away to silence, that the crackle and pop is actually on the recording itself- as opposed to being my copy!
Which reveals that these are straight lifts from the original 78s - warts and all.
(These being recordings made before the age of magnetic tape masters, and presumably no other surviving source material)
But once I realised this, I got into the feel of it, and actually am quite pleased it's there, as this preserves the authenticity of the experience of listening to the original discs - and with the rather antiquated recording technique used (as mentioned in the notes - was even considered so at the time they were made), it all adds up to a great authentic gramophone experience.
With the exceptions of the two sides of Zulus Ball on here, there is nothing about the sound of the actual instrumentation itself that is lacking (over and above the crackle of those original discs)... for there is a little fuzzing at times on the higher frequencies from this source disc, which obviously was in much worse condition than the others.
The only word on the sleeve which might give some pause is "Stereo", which of course is anachronistic for recordings made a good 35 years before the invention of stereo, so naturally, this is an "engineered stereo effect" most likely done for this issue...
....And I share those concerns, having heard some of the atrocious "stereo processed" crap from the seventies, which sound like either electronically induced echo swamped sci-fi nightmares, or bizarrely manage to make two independent mono channels from left and right, which addles the brain, and gives you a headache... but here it is expertly - and perhaps the greatest compliment I can offer it - unobtrusively done.
It's largely mono still, but with just the occasional outcropping of stereo on left or right... an occasional "lean" in either direction, but without going off the reservation, and departing from the unity of the sound. And it doesn't interfere with the music, so you mostly don't notice it's stereo-ness at all.
(big bonus - if only they'd adopted the same attitude with Elvis' Golden Records that I have!)
And the low fidelity of the original recordings, as mentioned in the notes, may actually have served to stand it in good stead with regard to the results, as a cleaner original recording may have demanded more work to accomplish this, and even exposed this technique's shortcomings.
So all in all, well worth getting if you want King Oliver's brilliant jazz without having to spend thousands upon thousands, but also, maybe you have, but just want to keep those discs preserved, and not risk damaging them, this will suit just as well.
(I'm sure these may have been re-issued since, and maybe re-mastered - whatever that means for master-less recordings like these - but this won't disappoint you if you find it)