Vinyl Album - Rolling Stones - Let It Bleed - Decca

Vinyl Album

Artist:	Rolling Stones
Title:	Let It Bleed
Label:	Decca
Country:	UK
Catalogue:	SKL 5025
Date:	5 Dec 1969
Format:	Stereo LP (also Mono LP)
Collection:	I Own It I Want It
Community:	43 Own, 4 Want
Price Guide:	Valuation Page
» Search eBay #AD » Search Amazon #AD This site contains affiliate links for which we may be compensated.

PRICE GUIDE

Add Valuation

Track	Artist	Title	Composer	Rating
A1	Rolling Stones	Gimmie Shelter	Jagger, Richard	9.1 Rate
A2	Rolling Stones	Love In Vain	Payne	8.4 Rate
A3	Rolling Stones	Country Honk	Jagger, Richard	6.8 Rate
A4	Rolling Stones	Live With Me	Jagger, Richard	8.2 Rate
A5	Rolling Stones	Let It Bleed	Jagger, Richard	8.5 Rate
B1	Rolling Stones	Midnight Rambler	Jagger, Richard	7.4 Rate
B2	Rolling Stones	You Got The Silver	Jagger, Richard	7.6 Rate
B3	Rolling Stones	Monkey Man	Jagger, Richard	8.2 Rate
B4	Rolling Stones	You Can't Always Get What You Want	Jagger, Richard	9.4 Rate

Notes

Includes colour poster and printed inner sleeve.

Images

Comments and Reviews


Juke Jules SUBS 21st Nov 2016		Indeed - 37/6 would have bought you about 20 ppints of 'Best', as would £60 now



ppint. 14th Nov 2016		"only" ?



Deltics 13th Nov 2016		NME review added. Only 37s 6d!



Magic Marmalade 21st Feb 2016		Thanks for uploading the Earliest unboxed labels All Rights.



Magic Marmalade 7th Dec 2015		The Rolling Stones best ever track:



Juke Jules SUBS 20th Sep 2015		Images added: rear of inner sleeve showing full credits, plus folded poster insert



Juke Jules SUBS 20th Sep 2015		Sir David Willcocks died last Thursday, and tributes to him include recollections of how he conducted his London Bach Choir on the track You Can't Always Get What You Want, with the boy sopranos happily taking a high C Looking at MM's images, I see that the choir was initially credited, but then redacted. Also, the BGVs were credited to Nanette Newman Comments on the single F 12952 give further details about Nanette



Magic Marmalade 15th Jun 2015		You know, I was so busy looking, I could not see that! Does it really count though? There are five tracks on the record on the cover, and the breaks (Quiet bits) look like it might actually be Let It Bleed, and side A at that. (Obviously just mocked up the label for the shoot... but makes you wonder: did someone pocket that copy after the photos? - could it be out there somewhere? - How much would that be worth on the open market? (!!!!!)) ((((Even the shattered bits and label, thatis!)))))



Boursin 15th Jun 2015		Quote: This is the only Decca album of theirs which does not have The Rolling Stones anywhere on the cover, inner sleeve, or labels Actually it does say "The Rolling Stones" on the vinyl disc shown in both the front and back cover photos. cough Maybe they wanted to minimise the risk of interpreting "The Rolling Stones Let It Bleed" as a declarative sentence. On the inner sleeve, where both parts of it are the same colour, there is a slash between them. (And Let It Be doesn't say "The Beatles" on the front cover either.)



Magic Marmalade 14th Jun 2015		That a whole nation of individuals will be offended for reasons of personal heritage and identity if we do not refer to the collective authors of this particular album as simply Rolling Stones, rather than The Rolling Stones? As a point of interest, if you point your eyes at this title on other formats, the 8 track of the time also does not have "the" anywhere on it next to Rolling Stones, but the CDs do, and have corrected this. So this is why I'm wondering what the reason is... it would seem there must be, it's just that I don't know what it is.



ppint. 14th Jun 2015		manic marmalade: and did you take note when "the ukraine" became "ukraine" ? (the reasons *may, possibly,* be congruent, identical - and even, the same...)



Magic Marmalade 14th Jun 2015		An odd little bit of trivia: This is the only Decca album of theirs which does not have The Rolling Stones anywhere on the cover, inner sleeve, or labels (One or two have it on the labels only, or the cover only, but the addition of "The" to their name is to be found somewhere). I notice a couple of their albums which do have "The" somewhere present on either label or cover (or element of packaging) have been entered just under the name Rolling Stones, whereas this has been entered under: The Rolling Stones... Is there any reason why the The has been dropped for this album entirely, and why they are a bit random on other albums? Should this be listed purely under the name: Rolling Stones (drop the The)? (Only Exile On Main St. is the same after the Deccas releases as far as submitted scans can reveal).



Magic Marmalade 13th Jun 2015		Added scans of "peep-hole" back cover, blue stereo inner sleeve, and label variations (Small labels). My matrices for this are: 3W, 6W.



janiejjones 9th Jan 2014		By the time of the boxed labels the inner was company l/h with poly lining. Laminated with 'Clarifoil' made by British Celanese Limited Printed by Clout & Baker



nboldock 28th Aug 2013		Apparently so! I wonder if anyone ate it...



Deltics 28th Aug 2013		Cake by Delia!