Monarch Deltas: Record 1: A: Δ21344, D: Δ21345-X Record 2: B: Δ21344-X, C: Δ21345
|
Dr Doom SUBS 7th Jan 2021
| | Just to clarify.
We DO encourage scans of EVERYTHING that came with an LP to be included on Vinyl Albums world.
That includes bonus 45s, posters, stickers, inserts etc. etc.
We do also like to see the bonus 45s included over on 45cat but this is in addition to their scans appearing on the album page. |
|
|
|
leonard ● 7th Jan 2021
| | The whole package should be here, including bonus 7"as it is integral part of the product You can ALSO add the bonus 7" to 45cat. |
|
|
|
edlongus SUBS ● 7th Jan 2021
| | 45worlds should be fair and respect inclusion of the bonus record, as it IS part of the album release. If u were 2 buy this album used, WITHOUT the bonus single, then the album would be incomplete. Why can't we just be logical and show that this album release comes WITH a bonus single?!? Is that 2 hard 2 do?!? Maybe I shouldn't say nuffin', but I posted this back in 2018, because IT WAS PART OF THE ORIGINAL ALBUM RELEASE!! And when I load an album into 45worlds, I load EVERYTHING - the cover scans (with gatefolds), record labels, bonus records, printed inner sleeves, lyric sheets, printed inserts, posters, iron-ons, 8X10 photographs, stamps, EVEN the original shrink wrap stickers!! I personally like 2 see everything that came with the album release, because sometimes when I buy used albums, I kinda like 2 see if I'm missing anything?!? |
|
|
|
83montlvr 7th Jan 2021
| | It doesn't make any sense to me either, because when I enter it into my personal catalog, I am not going to enter the bonus record separately since it was part of the album release. So if the bonus record had been on a 12" disc it would have been included as part of this entry and it would have been a 3 disc set, oh that's right it was a 3 disc set |
|
|
|
PhilMH ● 6th Jan 2021
| | Site policy (which I don't agree with) is to list the bonus record at 45cat because it's a 7-inch record; there are two problems with that:
(1) It's not a 45, it plays at 33 & 1/3!;
(2) It wasn't released separately from the album; in some places it could be bought separately from the album, but that was never intended or sanctioned by Motown or (more to the point) Stevie Wonder.
A similar situation exists for the 45's that were included with THE COMPLETE MOTOWN SINGLES CD sets - those singles weren't released separately, and so should be entered with the CD collections. |
|
|
|
83montlvr 6th Jan 2021
| | added another alternate set of labels. Question: why isn't the bonus record part of the entry for this album since it is part of this album? |
|
|
|
edlongus SUBS ● 16th Jul 2019
| | Third set of label variant scans added. |
|
|
|
Bgray1 4th Sep 2017
| | Added 24 page booklet. |
|
|
|
ZebedyZak 16th Dec 2016
| | My copy of "Frampton Comes Alive" was a "changer order" issue. I have seen other double albums released that way as well. |
|
|
|
Magic Marmalade 20th Jan 2015
| | Hello chaps... managed to pick up the UK version yesterday, and it has the same Recorder changer Label scheme too. |
|
|
|
TopPopper 17th Jan 2015
| | Surely you're supposed to stack them in order, so that you have side 1 followed automatically by side 2 - then stack them both again the other way up for side 3 and side 4. Only one trip to the record player required instead of three. |
|
|
|
Record Collector 17th Jan 2015
| | Play side one then record two side two drops down once that side is finished you have side three and when that finishes remove two and you have record one side four |
|
|
|
Magic Marmalade 16th Jan 2015
| | I suppose, thinking about it... the reason why Ihaven't come across them in my collection other than the basement tapes, because the double album itself wasn't too common at the time either, and only with things like ambitious prog rock bringing these doubles to a state of being "normal", and I should think a lot more complaints from the buying public when they realised this was how they were ordered.
Could there be a list (Changer order records) to be made here by someone with the appropriate knowledge? |
|
|
|
Trainman 16th Jan 2015
| | "Changer order" was actually the more common way of numbering them for most labels. It wasn't until the mid 70's when more people had manual turntables that it fell out of favor. |
|
|
|
Magic Marmalade 16th Jan 2015
| | Is this the same label order scheme that gave me grief with the Bob Dylan and The Band: Basement Tapes? |
|
|
|
Neil Forbes 16th Jan 2015
| | MCA was also known to put the LP sides in "changer order" so that when they were stacked on the spindle, side 1 would be first played, then side 2, then you pick the discs up together and turn both over, so side 3 was next to play, then finally side 4. The American Graffiti album and Neil Diamond's Hot August Night was coupled in the same manner. |
|
|
|
Trainman 16th Jan 2015
| | Added label scans. The bonus record is floating around here somewhere, if I find it I'll add it.
Random notes:
Gatefold cover
Album also included a songbook with all the lyrics
Sides are numbered in "changer order" |
|
|