{Images #1075751 & 1075752} is indeed a "gin-u-wine" original, pressed by RCA's Hollywood, CA plant. You may want to upload the front and back cover, and inner gatefold, of your copy, as original LP covers use for the text type Avant Garde Medium which is nowhere in evidence on the existing {Images #756790, 756791, 756792 & 756793}.
Right, I know what this is now! The S matrices were used on authorized (by PolyGram) Motown, Polydor, etc reissues distributed by Scorpio Music in the late 1990's (1997, IIRC), and they mostly never bothered to put PolyGram or any other new company name on them (though they did do that for James Brown King LPs that were reissued with Polydor labels and King catalogue numbers). Also, one of the Motown reissues, Earl Van Dyke's EARL OF FUNK, had a Soul label that was one solid colour instead of the original "swirl". Anyway, definitely legit, as Harry Weinger of PolyGram (now Universal) said so in an online forum at the time.
First of all, the "A PRODUCT OF MOTOWN RECORD CORP." rim print at bottom on the center labels would have been set in 6 point Linotype Trade Gothic Bold. Here, it all looks like computerized typesetting; the original LP would have used Avant Garde Book, rather than Helvetica as seen on the cover {Images #756790, 756791, 756792 & 756793}. As well, the greyish tint within the Tamla logo was more in keeping with repressings of old 45's that came with CD box sets of all the Motown singles year-by-year. Indeed, if you look at this entry, the one here appears to be the same as that. Is there an S 39191 / S 39192 in the deadwax of this copy, indicating a Rainbo pressing?
Are you sure, WB? I would have expected to see some mention of Universal Music on the cover and label, not to mention an entirely new catalogue number, seeing as Universal have owned the Motown catalogue since late 1998 (and Motown hasn't been Motown Record Corporation since 1988).