The "DJ" in the cat. # here would apply only to RCA Indianapolis pressings such as {Images #714467 & 714468}. Rockaway, NJ, would not have had the "DJ" within the cat. # on the label.
Yes, I was thinking the same actually, esp. since the DJ copy is not monaural. Shall we list it simply with the regular issues (as in those cases, where the cat. # of stock and DJ copies is the same)? On the other hand, it has kind of a cat. # of its own :)
Even though this was a "DJ only" copy, I wouldn't characterize this as "Promo Only" - the only difference between this and the regular stock copies is the absence of "DJ" from the latter, as by this time both DJ and stock pressings of LP's were all stereo.