CB May 5, 1951, p. 15 (Jazz 'n Blues Reviews)
CB May 12, 1951, p. 15 (King/Federal ad; #1 Music Operators in Oakland, Cal.)
BB May 12, 1951, p. 31; May 26, 1951, p. 30 (King/Federal ads)
BB May 26, 1951, p. 32 (R&B Juke Box charts - Based on reports received May 16, 17 and 18)
After doing some research, I discovered that Federal Records was owned and operated by King Records. Prior to 1953, King Records used the 78 RPM equalization curve with Turnover = 500 and Rolloff = -16 (NAB). King began using the RIAA curve in 1953.
Thank you for your response. I am aware that the RIAA became the standard in 1955, but I wanted to know what specific CURVE was used by Federal Records in 1951. I own a H.H. Scott 121-C preamplifier and wanted guidance on what the Turnover and Rolloff settings are for this disc. Mahalo & Aloha!
In 1951, the RIAA curve was not yet the standard recording and playback technique for the record industry and consumer audio equipment.
This was not established until 1955.
Before that the Federall company must have used another curve.
Does anyone know the 78 RPM equalization for this shellac? Did Federal Records use the RIAA curve in 1951? Or did Federal use different Turnover and Rolloff settings (AES, Columbia, Decca, Flat, etc)? Thank you very much in advance.
Tracks recorded 30Dec50, NYC, and 26Jan51, Cincinnati. Bill Brown and Clyde McPhatter lead vcls.
Looks like Billy Ward copyrighted this song early under his own name. The March 5 copyright is the official King/Federal one via Armo, the new publishing imprint shared by Syd Nathan with Ralph Bass. The really good thing about Syd Nathan's copyrights via all his thirty odd in-house imprints is that they often reflect fairly accurately (usually within a few weeks) the actual release date of the record. Every recorded track on his various labels was allocated a matrix/master number at time of recording or acquisition but only tracks actually released were filed for copyright and that was done at, or near, time of release, even if years after the recording date.
Added an A-side label with a hyphen in the title ("Sixty-Minute Man", like on the YouTube video) and made it the main image because it probably belongs to the first commercial 78 rpm pressing. Anyway this variant doesn't exist for the 45 rpm issue which was only released several weeks later.
You're right, RadioAl. Considering the date of the Cash Box review (with song durations, apparently from the Dee-Jay Special promo) and the regional chart action in early May 1951 (I wasn't able to find that page though), an April 1951 release seems reasonable. I have adjusted the notes and corrected the release month accordingly.
Following up on fixbutte's research, Cash Box picked up on Sixty Minute Man early - it was reviewed in the May 5, 1951 issue (p. 15) and in the same issue was reported as #3 by Oakland, CA jukebox operators (p. 17). The record must have begun reaching jukeboxes in late April.
Changed release month for this issue from March 1951 (what Marv Goldberg proposed) to May 1951 because this was the first month in which it was advertised (no mentions of Federal 12022 in the King/Federal ads of April 1951, in contrast to Federal 12001). The 45 rpm actually came out later although not in July but in June 1951 (first advertised in Billboard of June 23, 1951, p. 29).