Slipcase, containing cd with catnumber and barcode 88725457602 and 60-page notebook with pictures of 28 international magazine covers.
|
Apollo59 12th Aug 2017
| | @xiphophilos: That wouldn't surprise me, but perhaps that was some time ago. When I first joined I could immediately see the task ahead of me and thought, nah, I'll give it a couple of years then come back. So far I chose not to list around 1,000 bootlegs - too repetitive. |
|
|
|
xiphophilos 12th Aug 2017
| | You are lucky; I had to create entries for about 80% of my collection. |
|
|
|
Apollo59 11th Aug 2017
| | @xiphophilos: OK. However, you understand what I was saying.
I fully intend to scan stuff and will do when I finish the entries, fingernails withstanding pulling all these cases apart. I'd also much prefer just to do the scanning on its own without the footer of listing the track info too. Another thing is that I never for a second expected to have to list quite so many discs as it must be running to about 60%. But there again, looking at the titles that get entered by others, I'm not in the least bit surprised as there's absolutely no accounting for taste. |
|
|
|
xiphophilos 11th Aug 2017
| | @Apollo59: Anyone who adds an entry gets points for it; anyone who adds images gets some more. That's all the "credit" we give here.
If you want all the credits/points for an entry, you need to take the time and trouble to add images right away, and then these images will also be associated with your user name. If you wait and someone else adds images before you, we all are grateful to that person because it makes the database more useful for everyone else. There's no way to stake a personal claim to an entry. (And why would you want to do that in the first place?)
BTW, anyone who adds images to their entries also helps avoiding erroneous adjustments to their entries because then it becomes a lot more easy for us mods to verify the accuracy of their entries. |
|
|
|
Apollo59 9th Aug 2017
| | @Leonard: Aren't you the one who is the Moderator here?
I had originally made this entry.
I would have got the credit for it, correct?
Then you come along and mess it up, correct?
I said you need to to fix what you made a mistake with.
But that does not mean you taking the credit for that - that is wrong and down right fraudulent, isn't it?
I don't need or want your apology - I do need your corrective action - and that does not include taking credit for something you have absolutely no right to receive credit for.
You need to put everything back exactly as it was, including my credit.
What part of this do you not understand? |
|
|
|
leonard 9th Aug 2017
| | Yes, that's what I said. Lacking means not there. There were no images so I added them.
I think I have been polite all the time. Asking questions, making apologies and asking if you wanted to put it up (some people are crazy bout credits). You said you didn't want to do it, so I did. What's all the fuzz about? |
|
|
|
Apollo59 9th Aug 2017
| | @leonard: Lacked images? I haven't done ANY images as yet. I'm way too busy entering the details of the CD's which takes some time as most of my stuff isn't mainstream and I've had to list about 60% of it so far, and have omitted listing over 1,000 bootlegs because I just can't be bothered listing them - nobody else owns them anyway, and they're not ever likely too either, so what's the point.
Yes, I will get around to scanning everything that needs scanning in good time. |
|
|
|
leonard 9th Aug 2017
| | Like you I do my best. There is no need to get pissed. I will add the one you owned (including images which lacked). You only have to click I own. |
|
|
|
Apollo59 9th Aug 2017
| | @leonard: To be honest, I think it's your responsibility to sort this mess out as it was all of your own making. I've no idea what you had right first time round, and if it was, why didn't you just leave it that way? But seriously Leonard, I'm really not taking the time and trouble to carefully enter all this stuff for somebody to come along and mess with it. That REALLY pisses me off big time. |
|
|
|
leonard 9th Aug 2017
| | I misread your comment then. And I had it right the first time round when I added my images of the cd. Can you reenter or do I do the job? SOrry for the incovenience. |
|
|
|
Apollo59 9th Aug 2017
| | @leonard. no, I don't own this copy (I generally avoid all this kind of ephemeral packaging stuff that has got nothing to do with the music) - I own the copy that I had listed - wherever that is now.
I confirmed which copy I have and it isn't this.
I do have this:
Cat #: 88725457602
Barcode: 887254576020
I certainly don't see this same barcode above here? |
|
|
|
Apollo59 7th Aug 2017
| | @leonard: Yes, this here above is the copy I have. |
|
|
|
PhilMH 7th Aug 2017
| | The US Special Edition has exactly the same catalogue number and barcode as this, but I'll leave it alone until the Country issue (manufacture or markets) is resolved once and for all (soon, please!). |
|
|
|
leonard 7th Aug 2017
| | @apollo. I've added the images for this cd. Mine was in the special edition package which I entered with it's own barcode and cat#. Is yours also from this package (in which case I assume both entries have to be merged because they belong together), because there is already another European entry for the regular cd. |
|
|