Interpol here, yes international as the wind no matter how you slice it. This current UK cat malarkey on EU CDs, usually used by catters to indicate a UK release (it appears worldwide) is a nonsense as is abbreviating cat#s to the bolded part in order to signify a difference as this is also fairly universal. PhilMH is right this is international. USA has same cat#, Brazil and Mexico and these CDs were available in identical (UK and EU pressings) form in Australia as well as a locally produced version. There is however a digipak Australian version with a different secondary cat#. However, it is still the same thing really.
This trainspotters game of spot the minute difference in order to protect EU and UK listings is becoming very tiresome, Maybe someone up there in the Northern Hemisphere should rewrite the guidelines to suit because you don't seem to be able to deal with them as they stand.
Ah, a multi-market CD, how unusual! I suspect this little blighter was available as a single pressing in the UK, Europe, Australia, New Zealand and all points in between! The Virgin Benelux copyright doesn't mean much, only that it is Benelux because the Stones' company is based in Luxembourg (Prince Rupert Lowenstein, take a bow).
Introducing "the greatest rock & roll band in the world" to 45worlds CD Album. With these words, The Rolling Stones have [Artist ID: 895] whereas, significantly, The Beatles are on [Artist ID: 1].