Comment by W.B.lbl:
Glad you asked, both sides of that cover (front AND back) have modern phototypesetting. Also notice, on the top right of the back cover {Image #3554972}, "1024" inserted. Notice how it's in a different font from the "JLP."
F.T.R., the front cover's type also screams "1970's phototypesetting." There were a couple of alternatives to Harris and to Linotype - I wonder if this was Alphatype's version of Times New Roman Bold. (If not them, whom? Any 1970's phototypesetting mavens on the boards here?)
Comment by rhythmdog:
W.B.lbl, does your comment apply to the front cover print? If so, then I suppose it must be a clever fake after all. If the comment applies to the back cover only, that back cover image is actually probably from a bootleg - it's not from the same source as the front cover.
Comment by W.B.lbl:
This does seem like a bootleg - especially given the use of a phototypesetting version of Times New Roman with Bold that was in use in some printing houses in the 1970's. In short, this would not have been made in the '50's.
Indeed, I wonder if this and
the copy actually marked 'bootleg' shouldn't be merged?