78 RPM - Emilio De Gogorza - For All Eternity - Victor - USA

78 RPM Record

Artist:	Emilio De Gogorza
Label:	Victor
Country:	USA
Catalogue:	64038
Date:	May 1906
Format:	10"
Collection:	I Own It I Want It
Community:	1 Owns
Price Guide:	Valuation Page
» Search eBay #AD » Search Amazon #AD This site contains affiliate links for which we may be compensated.

PRICE GUIDE

Add Valuation

Track	Artist	Title	Composer	Rating
A	Emilio De Gogorza	For All Eternity	Mascheroni	Rate

Notes

Baritone with Orchestra in English

Grand Prize Label:
Matrix B-1734-1 or -3; recorded Philadelphia, PA, October 5, 1904.

Red Patents Label with date May 1, 1912 (issued mid-1912 - 1913):
Matrix B-7077-1; recorded Camden, NJ, May 13, 1909.

Victor Batwing label with price notice "75c. in U. S. A." and with the word VICTOR on the side of Nipper’s gramophone (issued 1914 - mid-1916):
Matrix B-7077-3; recorded Camden, NJ, April 18, 1916.
(DAHR)

Images

Number: 1978568

THUMBNAIL
Uploaded By: xiphophilos
Description: Victor 64038 label (1906 pressing)

Number: 1978565

Uploaded By: xiphophilos
Description: Victor 64038 (1908-1909 release) (from archive.org)

Number: 1978286

Uploaded By: xiphophilos
Description: Victor 64038 label (1912-1913 repress)

Number: 1645496

Uploaded By: walkinginmyshoes
Edited By: scrough
Description: Victor 64038 label (1914-1916 repress)

Comments and Reviews


xiphophilos 20th Jun 2019		The 81,000 series was the original 10-inch premium-prized Victor Red Seal series, costing $2 and introduced in 1903. In April/May 1906, its prize was reduced to $1. Around the same time, the 64,000 series was introduced as a new low-prized Red Seal series, which also cost $1.



scrough 20th Jun 2019		Bob, Other folks may be able to give you a better answer, but if you look at this DAHR page you'll find there were two recording dates (1909 and 1916) and lots of releases. The 1909 recording on Victor 81094 wasn't 'issued' (but perhaps issued outside the US? Is 81xxx a 'foreign' series?), which seems to be why 'not issued' appears in the main heading you quoted.



Bob1951 20th Jun 2019		I have run into this before with DAHR. I find this statement contradicts itself: "Victor 64038 (Not issued) (Red Seal 10-in. single-faced) The following matrix(es) were released with this catalog number:" First they say "(Not Issued)", but on the next line they say, "The following matrix(es) were released with this catalog number". Maybe we (I), just don't know what this means. This is confusing, at least to me. Are they saying it was not issued, but it was released? Is'nt "released" and "issued" the same thing? If you click on the matrix number in DAHR, you will find an mp3 recording of this record on the page.



Mike Gann 20th Jun 2019		DAHR shows this record as not issued