|
mister_tmg 17th Mar 2023
| | The Dave Clark Five and The Tornados were on 78. For the rest, nothing (original) comes up when searching on Popsike. It's funny that The Beatles were prolific on 78, but the Rolling Stones had nothing on that format. |
|
|
|
78rpm-maniac 15th Aug 2022
| | Hi, what do you think.
Do other Beat groups also exist on Indian 78-rpm-records.??
OK, Beatles is well discovered, also Cliff and the Shadows, Swinging Blue Jeans and Manfred Mann are also known, but what about The Dave Clark Five, Herman´s Hermits, Peter and Gordon, Gerry and the Pacemakers, Billy J. Kramer and The Dakotas, Freddie and The Dreamers, The Hollies and other bands from the EMI-Labelgroup.
Or what about Decca, Capitol or London-Artists, like The Tornados, Brian Poole and The Tremeloes, Rolling Stones, some other British or American sixties artists and songs on London India if exist. ? |
|
|
|
liskeard78s 4th Jun 2021
| | Still no evidence of its existence - yet. |
|
|
|
xiphophilos 27th Mar 2019
| | Frank Daniels also doubts that this record actually exists on 78rpm, cf. https://wwww.friktech.com/btls/in/in78.pdf. He does not even list it. I'd suggest to simply delete this entry as unverifiable. |
|
|
|
An6y66 8th May 2014
| | The discography is still under construction but the introductory paragraph might help with the argument for 78's existing of these later pressing yokono.com
Also I think that as the 7" indian releases still carried the 45-R.... prefix suggests it was the differentiate from the (78)-R... pressings or it could just be something that was never updated from old style labels. |
|
|
|
nboldock 7th May 2014
| | The unicorn applies for records that were scheduled for release but never made it (for whatever reason).
If a record simply does not exist (and was never scheduled to exist), then the unicorn isn't really right. I think it should stay as it is for now. If we can prove it doesn't exist, then for me it gets deleted. However (and I think we would all prefer this outcome) if we can prove that it DOES exist, well... |
|
|
|
Excello-2101 SUBS 6th May 2014
| |
Just put the unicorn icon up there. Then if a copy does turn up, the unicorn can be replaced. |
|
|
|
An6y66 6th May 2014
| | Yes there is some dubious reports on the existance pressing. But I read on one discography that some large and reputable dealers had for sale Indian 78s of hey Jude and obladi. Which if do really exist it stands to reason the singles inbetween exist.
But it may be a good idea if a mod wants to add a note to these later pressing to say they are unconfirmed and there is disagreement between online discographies on there existence? |
|
|
|
Jock_Girl ● 6th May 2014
| | It is important to note that the existence of any of the Indian and Filipino Beatles 78s listed of later releases (post 1965) that do not have images are highly questionable. A friend of mine who is an authority on Beatles 78s has there is a very good possibility that they DO NOT exist as no other 78s on Parlophone by other exist from the same time period. |
|
|
|
An6y66 6th May 2014
| | I typed the cat number wrong on this can it be changed to "R. 5675" thanks {Done!} |
|
|
|
zabadak 13th Feb 2014
| | Blimey! Can it be? |
|
|
|
Orbiting Cat 12th Feb 2014
| | Does this really exist? If so, it must be the only instance of psychedelia on 78?
The Inner Light:
|
|
|