Dunhill - Latest Updates

---

Comment by jakal68:

Full album

[YouTube Video]

---

Comment by BenLPMarts:

BB & RW reviews 4 April 70 [BB pg 43; RW pg 1]. CB review 11 April 70 pg 30. First ARSA mention 29 March 70 on T40 WAEB Allentown PA. Showing advert of Dunhill releases CB 4 April 70.

Mod Edit: Date Fixed.

---

Comment by BenLPMarts:

BB review 29 Sept 68 pg 87 [didn't check CB or RW]

---

Comment by BenLPMarts:

I only found 1 review in CB for 5 July 69 pg 37. LP did also chart BB same week . No review in RW [that I could find searching around that date] Odd/funny that ARSA 1st mention is not until 12 July 69 for Toronto CHUM.

---

Comment by BenLPMarts:

BB, CB & RW reviews all 18 May 68 [BB pg 65; CB pg 48; RW pg 1]. First ARSA mention 4 May on T40 WSBA in York PA next KXFM San Bernardina CA on 10 May 68. I agree this is a May '68 release. Charted BB 25 May 68.

---

Comment by thewillismon:

Track A1
[YouTube Video]

---

Comment by BenLPMarts:

CB & RW reviews 11 March 67 [CB pg 36; RW pg 1]. BB review & LP chart 18 March 67 [review back pg 84]. ARSA shows SLC UT T40 KNAK reporting 1st airplay 9 Jan 67 +1 more in Jan, then 6 more stations in Feb 67 and the floodgates open in March when record hit stores so both Jan & March '67 are correct. Interesting side note is that Lou Adler sold Dunhill to ABC late '66 and I saw 2 dif trades showing Adler & Clive Davis announcing CBS distributing Adler's new [then] Ode Records in March '67. Let's hear it for 'key man' AND 'non-compete' clauses as well as acetates, test pressings & advance promos.

---

Comment by BenLPMarts:

CB & RW reviews both 17 Sept 66 [CB pg 54; RW pg 1]. [missing some BB pages for Sep 66 so...?]

---

Comment by BenLPMarts:

BB & RW reviews 26 Feb 66 [BB back pg 68; RW pg 8]. First ARSA mention 18 Feb 66 on T40 KMEN in San Bernardino CA.

---

Comment by edlongus SUBS:

Label variant scans added.

...TheDroid, where your copies have a Side 1 and a Side 2, my copy has a SIDE A and a SIDE B!! ☺
[YouTube Video]
[YouTube Video]

---

Comment by whitewhale1965:

02 track title also appears as Yesterday's Shunshine on other LPs and CDs. Try saying that 3 times fast.

---

Comment by whitewhale1965:

Yes, old record nut. The operating room scene is really the back cover on mine, too.

---

Comment by whitewhale1965:

Added variant a-side label image. Bottom print reads: Ⓒ Dunhill Records, Inc. MCMLXXI
On the back of the sleeve it says: "Manufactured By Record Club of America under special license". The b-side is identical to image #1515568.

---

Comment by BenLPMarts:

BB & RW reviews 16 June 73 [BB pg 84; RW pg 22].

---

Comment by lorangrecords SUBS:

[YouTube Video]

---

Comment by lorangrecords SUBS:

Added stock copy labels

---

Comment by Rrtid54:

I just wanted to thank vidman45 for adding the inside gatefold. All other sites I've found have at least one error in the lyrics for American City Suite:

You could be king
If she believed your story
When it was over
If she laughed at you

It should be:
But it was over

Thanks for running this site; gotta go now, but I'll be back.

---

Comment by W.B.lbl:

I still think Columbia Pitman's {Images #1354719 & 1354721} was better laid out than Santa Maria's {Images #3594185 & 3594186}.

---

Comment by Bgray1:

Added a fourth label variant.

---

Comment by robozuc:

@TheDroid,
I agree with your considerations and I think that anyone who wants to talk about inner sleeves could take a look or contribute in 45spaces/Company Sleeves:Lp perhaps making a reference in the comments.
If I'm sure that the inner sleeve is authentic I usually add it, sometimes this is hidden like here , that's fine too.

---

Comment by TheDroid:

@robozuc - the real problem with relying on posted images of inner sleeves to determine completeness is that there is little or no assurance that the pictures sleeve was in the original packaging. There is also seldom any way to determine if a particular generic sleeve is associated with a particular album/LP. If there is a way to determine this (ie. Catalog #), then, of course, it should be included. With the proliferation of used record stores over the past 50-60 years, many sleeves have been changed in packaging, often with no care to even the label.

---

Comment by robozuc:

@Kevin Walsh1
Personally I believe that being able to see the inner sleeves, even if generic, helps the collector to have a complete vision of the disc, the value can change depending on the completeness of the item.
But this is my personal opinion.

---

Comment by LaurenceD SUBS:

from Cash Box May 31, 1969, Insights & Sounds:
"Originally scheduled for January release, the LP was delayed until May 26th principally according to v.p. Jay Lasker, "because Jimmy was dissatisfied with a lot of the songs he had written ... he wrote five songs in five days ..."